Home > Uncategorized > Democracy isn’t online, yet

Democracy isn’t online, yet

The Web has made itself useful in many information-gathering processes, such as comparison shopping and academic research, to the extent that one pretty much expects that the information one needs is online. If I have to actually make a trip to the library or a store or a government office just to get information, that’s exceptional, and I may decide that I didn’t really need that information after all.

Against this background I was surprised today by the way elections seem to work. Before the election I wanted to learn more about the candidates in the primary race for Governor’s Council, 6th district. It was pretty easy to find out on the Web that there were two candidates in the democratic primary, and who they were, a big advance from ten years ago. Google led me to one candidate’s Facebook page which announced, the day before the election, “In the near future I will be notifying you of my announcement date to formally kick off our campaign as your Governors Councilor in the 6th District.” As this was her “home page” the message I got was that she had changed her mind and wasn’t running. Google also gave me an uninformative neighborhood newspaper article on her candidacy. For the other candidate, there was a link to his web site, which was somewhat useful – at least I knew he was campaigning and learned something of his experience. But that was about it. My local towny email discussion list had nothing on the race, nor did the League of Women Voters (as far as I could tell).

I had run across one candidate at the Porter T station but didn’t have time to talk with him – and I figured I could just look him up…

Anyhow, I assumed, reflexively, that the candidate who said (via the Web) that he was campaigning would probably win, and the one who hadn’t said so wouldn’t. But a look at the election results showed the opposite: 1891 votes for the candidate without an online announcement or active site, and 1847 for the one with.

[Update 2012-08-28: These vote tallies must have been preliminary. Suzanne English-Merullo apparently lost to Terrence Kennedy in a close race. See here. But my point remains – someone with effectively no Web presence got half the votes.]

Clearly there’s a lot going on out there in the real world – human interactions that somehow influence the outcome of this and other races – that leaves no trace on the Web. (Or at least I hope there is! Otherwise this election outcome was basically random.) I don’t know whether that’s good or bad, but it’s inconvenient. It means that if I want to participate in the democratic process, it’s not enough (yet) to just surf.

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. ralphw
    2011-01-11 at 07:14

    I often make the assumption of a “parallel universe” that’s like the real world, only in electronic form.

    Sometimes, I am disappointed – then I realize that if I put a document of my own out there, naming names of things in the real world, eventually the details will be filled in.

    Out of curiosity, who were the candidates?

    • 2012-08-28 at 14:55

      To answer your question, Suzanne English-Merullo apparently lost narrowly to Terrence Kennedy (as I say in the update).

      I can’t really give evidence for this, but it feels like the relation of the Web to local elections is different this year. Of the three candidates in the 3rd council district primary this year, two have excellent web sites. (The one who doesn’t is the incumbent.) (I’m in a new district this year due to redistricting.) And there seems to be lots more information about the candidates available from local news sites and blogs, compared to two years ago.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: